cover
- Published: March 2025
- Pages: 525
- Tables: 92
- Figures: 133
- Companies profiled: 290
Sustainable packaging encompasses designs and materials that reduce the consumption of resources, utilize renewable or recycled inputs, and provide responsible end-of-life options such as recyclability, compostability, or reusability. True sustainable packaging balances ecological considerations with economic and social factors, addressing everything from raw material sourcing to manufacturing processes, distribution efficiency, consumer use, and disposal. Rather than focusing solely on a single attribute like biodegradability, comprehensive sustainable packaging approaches consider multiple environmental indicators including carbon footprint, water usage, and waste reduction. Companies increasingly view sustainable packaging as both an environmental responsibility and a business imperative, driven by consumer demand, regulatory pressures, and corporate sustainability commitments. The concept emphasizes designing packaging systems that work effectively while minimizing negative environmental externalities, often guided by principles of circular economy that aim to keep materials in productive use rather than becoming waste.
The global sustainable packaging market has experienced robust growth in recent years, driven by converging factors including heightened consumer environmental awareness, stringent regulatory frameworks, corporate sustainability targets, and technological innovations. Paper and board materials currently dominate the sustainable packaging landscape, accounting for roughly 40% of the market share due to their renewable nature, recyclability, and consumer acceptance. Bio-based plastics represent the fastest-growing segment, expanding at nearly 10% annually as manufacturers seek alternatives to conventional petroleum-based plastics. Recycled plastics also continue gaining market share as recycling infrastructure improves and brands commit to incorporating post-consumer recycled content.
Several key trends are shaping the future outlook. Material innovation remains paramount, with significant R&D investments in novel biomaterials, advanced recycling technologies, and compostable solutions. Packaging design is evolving toward minimalism and mono-materials to improve recyclability. Digital technologies like blockchain and smart packaging are enhancing supply chain transparency and enabling better end-of-life management.
The market faces challenges including higher costs of sustainable alternatives, technical limitations in material performance, and inconsistent waste management infrastructure globally. However, economies of scale and technological advancements are gradually reducing cost premiums, while performance gaps with conventional materials continue to narrow. Looking ahead, the market is poised for accelerated transformation as regulatory pressures intensify worldwide. The EU's Packaging and Packaging Waste Directive revision, plastic taxes, and extended producer responsibility schemes are creating strong incentives for sustainable solutions. Major brands' public commitments to make all packaging recyclable, reusable, or compostable by 2025-2030 are driving further innovation and market growth.
The Global Market for Sustainable Packaging 2025-2035 is an extensive analysis available of the global sustainable packaging market, covering all major segments, materials, technologies, and regional developments with forecasts spanning 2025-2035. As regulatory pressures, consumer demands, and corporate sustainability commitments accelerate the transition away from conventional packaging, this report provides critical intelligence for businesses across the packaging value chain.
Report Contents include :
- Market Segmentation Analysis:
- Packaging materials (biodegradable polymers, paper/board, bioplastics)
- Packaging product types (rigid, flexible, paper/board)
- End-use markets (food & beverage, consumer goods, e-commerce)
- Regions (North America, Europe, Asia-Pacific, Rest of World)
- Material Technologies:
- Biodegradable and compostable materials (PLA, PHA, PBAT, TPS)
- Paper and fiber-based alternatives (including novel barrier coatings)
- Bio-based conventional polymers (Bio-PE, Bio-PET, Bio-PP)
- Advanced recycled materials (mechanical and chemical recycling)
- Emerging technologies (seaweed, mycelium, nanocellulose)
- Packaging Applications:
- Paper and board packaging developments
- Food packaging innovations
- Flexible packaging solutions
- Rigid packaging advancements
- Carbon capture-derived materials
- Sustainability Metrics:
- Life cycle assessments (LCAs)
- Carbon footprint comparisons
- End-of-life scenarios
- Recycling technologies for sustainable materials
- Recycling Technologies:
- Mechanical recycling advancements
- Chemical recycling technologies (pyrolysis, gasification, depolymerization)
- Sorting and processing innovations
- Infrastructure development
- Market Drivers and Challenges:
- Regulatory frameworks and policy developments
- Consumer preferences and willingness to pay
- Brand owner commitments and initiatives
- Technical limitations and innovation progress
- Cost dynamics and economic factors
- Competitive Landscape: Profiles of 290+ companies across the value chain, including:
- Material developers and suppliers
- Packaging converters and manufacturers
- Brand owners implementing sustainable solutions
- Technology providers and innovators. Companies profiled include 9Fiber, Acorn Pulp Group, ADBioplastics, Advanced Biochemical (Thailand), Advanced Paper Forming, Aeropowder, AGRANA Staerke, Agrosustain, Ahlstrom-Munksjö, AIM Sweden, Akorn Technology, Alberta Innovates/Innotech Materials, Alter Eco Pulp, Alterpacks, AmicaTerra, An Phát Bioplastics, Anellotech, Ankor Bioplastics, ANPOLY, Apeel Sciences, Applied Bioplastics, Aquapak Polymers, Archer Daniel Midland, Arekapak, Arkema, Arrow Greentech, Attis Innovations, Asahi Kasei Chemicals, Avantium, Avani Eco, Avient Corporation, Balrampur Chini Mills, BASF, Berry Global, Be Green Packaging, Bioelements Group, Bio Fab NZ, BIO-FED, Biofibre, Biokemik, BIOLO, BioLogiQ, BIO-LUTIONS International, Biomass Resin Holdings, Biome Bioplastics, BIOTEC, Bio2Coat, Bioform Technologies, Biovox, Bioplastech, BioSmart Nano, BlockTexx, Blue Ocean Closures, Bluepha Beijing Lanjing Microbiology Technology, BOBST, Borealis, Brightplus, Buhl Paperform, Business Innovation Partners, CapaTec, Carbiolice, Carbios, Cass Materials, Cardia Bioplastics, CARAPAC Company, Celanese, Cellugy, Cellutech, Celwise, Chemol Company, Chemkey Advanced Materials Technology, Chinova Bioworks, Cirkla, CJ Biomaterials, CKF, Coastgrass, Constantia Flexibles, Corumat, Cruz Foam, CuanTec, and Cullen Eco-Friendly Packaging and more.
- Future Outlook:
- Emerging technologies and materials
- Market growth projections through 2035
- Industry transformation scenarios
- Investment opportunities and risk assessment
1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 26
- 1.1 Global Packaging Market 26
- 1.2 What is sustainable packaging? 27
- 1.3 The Global Market for Sustainable Packaging 29
- 1.3.1 By packaging materials 29
- 1.3.1.1 Tonnes 29
- 1.3.1.2 Revenues 30
- 1.3.2 By packaging product type 32
- 1.3.2.1 Tonnes 32
- 1.3.2.2 Revenues 32
- 1.3.3 By end-use market 33
- 1.3.3.1 Tonnes 34
- 1.3.3.2 Revenues 35
- 1.3.4 By region 36
- 1.3.4.1 Tonnes 36
- 1.3.4.2 Revenues 37
- 1.3.1 By packaging materials 29
- 1.4 Main types 38
- 1.5 Prices 41
- 1.6 Commercial products 42
- 1.7 Market Trends 45
- 1.8 Market Drivers for recent growth in Sustainable Packaging 46
- 1.9 Challenges for Biodegradable and Compostable Packaging 47
2 INTRODUCTION 50
- 2.1 Market overview 50
- 2.2 Types of sustainable packaging materials 51
- 2.2.1 Biodegradable and Compostable Materials 51
- 2.2.1.1 PLA (Polylactic Acid) 51
- 2.2.1.2 Bagasse 52
- 2.2.1.3 Mushroom Packaging 53
- 2.2.1.4 Seaweed-Based Materials 55
- 2.2.2 Paper and Fiber-Based Materials 56
- 2.2.2.1 Recycled Paper/Cardboard 56
- 2.2.2.2 Molded Pulp 57
- 2.2.2.3 Bamboo Packaging 58
- 2.2.3 Bio-Based Plastics 59
- 2.2.3.1 Bio-PE and Bio-PET 59
- 2.2.3.2 PHAs (Polyhydroxyalkanoates) 61
- 2.2.4 Reusable and Upcycled Materials 62
- 2.2.4.1 Glass 62
- 2.2.4.2 Aluminum 64
- 2.2.4.3 Upcycled Agricultural Waste 66
- 2.2.5 Other Materials 67
- 2.2.5.1 Edible Packaging 67
- 2.2.5.2 Cellulose-Based Films 68
- 2.2.5.3 Algae-Based Materials 70
- 2.2.1 Biodegradable and Compostable Materials 51
- 2.3 Packaging lifecycle 71
- 2.3.1 Raw materials 71
- 2.3.2 Manufacturing 72
- 2.3.3 Transport 73
- 2.3.4 Packaging in-use 74
- 2.3.5 End of life 75
3 MATERIALS IN SUSTAINABLE PACKAGING 75
- 3.1 Materials innovation 75
- 3.2 Active packaging 76
- 3.3 Monomaterial packaging 76
- 3.4 Conventional polymer materials used in packaging 77
- 3.4.1 Polyolefins: Polypropylene and polyethylene 77
- 3.4.1.1 Overview 77
- 3.4.1.2 Grades 78
- 3.4.1.3 Producers 78
- 3.4.2 PET and other polyester polymers 79
- 3.4.2.1 Overview 79
- 3.4.3 Renewable and bio-based polymers for packaging 80
- 3.4.4 Comparison of synthetic fossil-based and bio-based polymers 82
- 3.4.5 Processes for bioplastics in packaging 82
- 3.4.6 End-of-life treatment of bio-based and sustainable packaging 83
- 3.4.1 Polyolefins: Polypropylene and polyethylene 77
- 3.5 Synthetic bio-based packaging materials 84
- 3.5.1 Polylactic acid (Bio-PLA) 84
- 3.5.1.1 Overview 84
- 3.5.1.2 Properties 85
- 3.5.1.3 Applications 85
- 3.5.1.4 Advantages 86
- 3.5.1.5 Challenges 86
- 3.5.1.6 Commercial examples 87
- 3.5.2 Polyethylene terephthalate (Bio-PET) 87
- 3.5.2.1 Overview 87
- 3.5.2.2 Properties 88
- 3.5.2.3 Applications 88
- 3.5.2.4 Advantages of Bio-PET in Packaging 89
- 3.5.2.5 Challenges and Limitations 89
- 3.5.2.6 Commercial examples 90
- 3.5.3 Polytrimethylene terephthalate (Bio-PTT) 91
- 3.5.3.1 Overview 91
- 3.5.3.2 Production Process 91
- 3.5.3.3 Properties 91
- 3.5.3.4 Applications 91
- 3.5.3.5 Advantages of Bio-PTT in Packaging 92
- 3.5.3.6 Challenges and Limitations 92
- 3.5.3.7 Commercial examples 92
- 3.5.4 Polyethylene furanoate (Bio-PEF) 93
- 3.5.4.1 Overview 93
- 3.5.4.2 Properties 93
- 3.5.4.3 Applications 93
- 3.5.4.4 Advantages of Bio-PEF in Packaging 94
- 3.5.4.5 Challenges and Limitations 94
- 3.5.4.6 Commercial examples 94
- 3.5.5 Bio-PA 95
- 3.5.5.1 Overview 95
- 3.5.5.2 Properties 95
- 3.5.5.3 Applications in Packaging 95
- 3.5.5.4 Advantages of Bio-PA in Packaging 96
- 3.5.5.5 Challenges and Limitations 96
- 3.5.5.6 Commercial examples 96
- 3.5.6 Poly(butylene adipate-co-terephthalate) (Bio-PBAT)- Aliphatic aromatic copolyesters 97
- 3.5.6.1 Overview 97
- 3.5.6.2 Properties 97
- 3.5.6.3 Applications in Packaging 97
- 3.5.6.4 Advantages of Bio-PBAT in Packaging 98
- 3.5.6.5 Challenges and Limitations 98
- 3.5.6.6 Commercial examples 98
- 3.5.7 Polybutylene succinate (PBS) and copolymers 98
- 3.5.7.1 Overview 98
- 3.5.7.2 Properties 99
- 3.5.7.3 Applications in Packaging 99
- 3.5.7.4 Advantages of Bio-PBS and Co-polymers in Packaging 100
- 3.5.7.5 Challenges and Limitations 100
- 3.5.7.6 Commercial examples 100
- 3.5.8 Polypropylene (Bio-PP) 101
- 3.5.8.1 Overview 101
- 3.5.8.2 Properties 101
- 3.5.8.3 Applications in Packaging 101
- 3.5.8.4 Advantages of Bio-PP in Packaging 101
- 3.5.8.5 Challenges and Limitations 102
- 3.5.8.6 Commercial examples 102
- 3.5.1 Polylactic acid (Bio-PLA) 84
- 3.6 Natural bio-based packaging materials 102
- 3.6.1 Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) 102
- 3.6.1.1 Properties 103
- 3.6.1.2 Applications in Packaging 103
- 3.6.1.3 Advantages of PHA in Packaging 104
- 3.6.1.4 Challenges and Limitations 105
- 3.6.1.5 Commercial examples 105
- 3.6.2 Starch-based blends 105
- 3.6.2.1 Overview 105
- 3.6.2.2 Properties 106
- 3.6.2.3 Applications in Packaging 106
- 3.6.2.4 Advantages of Starch-Based Blends in Packaging 106
- 3.6.2.5 Challenges and Limitations 106
- 3.6.2.6 Commercial examples 107
- 3.6.3 Cellulose 107
- 3.6.3.1 Feedstocks 107
- 3.6.3.1.1 Wood 108
- 3.6.3.1.2 Plant 108
- 3.6.3.1.3 Tunicate 108
- 3.6.3.1.4 Algae 109
- 3.6.3.1.5 Bacteria 109
- 3.6.3.2 Microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) 110
- 3.6.3.2.1 Properties 110
- 3.6.3.3 Nanocellulose 111
- 3.6.3.3.1 Cellulose nanocrystals 111
- 3.6.3.3.1.1 Applications in packaging 111
- 3.6.3.3.2 Cellulose nanofibers 112
- 3.6.3.3.2.1 Applications in packaging 113
- 3.6.3.3.3 Bacterial Nanocellulose (BNC) 119
- 3.6.3.3.3.1 Applications in packaging 121
- 3.6.3.3.1 Cellulose nanocrystals 111
- 3.6.3.4 Commercial examples 122
- 3.6.3.1 Feedstocks 107
- 3.6.4 Protein-based bioplastics in packaging 122
- 3.6.4.1 Feedstocks 122
- 3.6.4.2 Commercial examples 124
- 3.6.5 Lipids and waxes for packaging 124
- 3.6.5.1 Overview 124
- 3.6.5.2 Commercial examples 125
- 3.6.6 Seaweed-based packaging 125
- 3.6.6.1 Overview 125
- 3.6.6.2 Production 126
- 3.6.6.3 Applications in packaging 127
- 3.6.6.4 Producers 127
- 3.6.7 Mycelium 127
- 3.6.7.1 Overview 127
- 3.6.7.2 Applications in packaging 128
- 3.6.7.3 Commercial examples 129
- 3.6.8 Chitosan 129
- 3.6.8.1 Overview 129
- 3.6.8.2 Applications in packaging 130
- 3.6.8.3 Commercial examples 130
- 3.6.9 Bio-naphtha 132
- 3.6.9.1 Overview 132
- 3.6.9.2 Markets and applications 132
- 3.6.9.3 Commercial examples 134
- 3.6.1 Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) 102
4 PACKAGING RECYCLING 135
- 4.1 Mechanical recycling 136
- 4.1.1 Closed-loop mechanical recycling 137
- 4.1.2 Open-loop mechanical recycling 137
- 4.1.3 Polymer types, use, and recovery 137
- 4.2 Advanced chemical recycling 138
- 4.2.1 Main streams of plastic waste 138
- 4.2.2 Comparison of mechanical and advanced chemical recycling 139
- 4.3 Capacities 139
- 4.4 Global polymer demand 2022-2040, segmented by recycling technology 141
- 4.5 Global market by recycling process 2020-2024, metric tons 142
- 4.6 Chemically recycled plastic products 143
- 4.7 Market map 144
- 4.8 Value chain 146
- 4.9 Life Cycle Assessments (LCA) of advanced plastics recycling processes 147
- 4.10 Pyrolysis 148
- 4.10.1 Non-catalytic 148
- 4.10.2 Catalytic 150
- 4.10.2.1 Polystyrene pyrolysis 151
- 4.10.2.2 Pyrolysis for production of bio fuel 152
- 4.10.2.3 Used tires pyrolysis 155
- 4.10.2.3.1 Conversion to biofuel 156
- 4.10.2.4 Co-pyrolysis of biomass and plastic wastes 157
- 4.10.3 SWOT analysis 157
- 4.10.4 Companies and capacities 158
- 4.11 Gasification 159
- 4.11.1 Technology overview 159
- 4.11.1.1 Syngas conversion to methanol 160
- 4.11.1.2 Biomass gasification and syngas fermentation 164
- 4.11.1.3 Biomass gasification and syngas thermochemical conversion 164
- 4.11.2 SWOT analysis 165
- 4.11.3 Companies and capacities (current and planned) 165
- 4.11.1 Technology overview 159
- 4.12 Dissolution 166
- 4.12.1 Technology overview 166
- 4.12.2 SWOT analysis 167
- 4.12.3 Companies and capacities (current and planned) 168
- 4.13 Depolymerisation 169
- 4.13.1 Hydrolysis 170
- 4.13.1.1 Technology overview 171
- 4.13.1.2 SWOT analysis 172
- 4.13.2 Enzymolysis 172
- 4.13.2.1 Technology overview 172
- 4.13.2.2 SWOT analysis 173
- 4.13.3 Methanolysis 174
- 4.13.3.1 Technology overview 174
- 4.13.3.2 SWOT analysis 175
- 4.13.4 Glycolysis 176
- 4.13.4.1 Technology overview 176
- 4.13.4.2 SWOT analysis 177
- 4.13.5 Aminolysis 178
- 4.13.5.1 Technology overview 178
- 4.13.5.2 SWOT analysis 179
- 4.13.6 Companies and capacities (current and planned) 179
- 4.13.1 Hydrolysis 170
- 4.14 Other advanced chemical recycling technologies 180
- 4.14.1 Hydrothermal cracking 180
- 4.14.2 Pyrolysis with in-line reforming 181
- 4.14.3 Microwave-assisted pyrolysis 181
- 4.14.4 Plasma pyrolysis 182
- 4.14.5 Plasma gasification 183
- 4.14.6 Supercritical fluids 183
5 MARKETS AND APPLICATIONS 184
- 5.1 PAPER AND BOARD PACKAGING 184
- 5.1.1 Market overview 185
- 5.1.2 Recycled Paper and Cardboard 186
- 5.1.2.1 Post-consumer recycled (PCR) content paperboard 186
- 5.1.2.2 Kraft paper made from recycled fibers 187
- 5.1.2.3 Corrugated cardboard with high recycled content 188
- 5.1.3 FSC/PEFC Certified Virgin Fibers 188
- 5.1.3.1 Sustainably managed forest sources 188
- 5.1.3.2 Chain-of-custody certified materials 189
- 5.1.4 Alternative Fiber Sources 190
- 5.1.4.1 Bamboo-based paper and board 190
- 5.1.4.2 Agricultural waste fibers (wheat straw, sugarcane bagasse) 191
- 5.1.4.3 Hemp and flax fiber papers 192
- 5.1.5 Plastic-Free Barrier Papers 193
- 5.1.5.1 Clay-coated papers 193
- 5.1.5.2 Silicone-coated papers 194
- 5.1.5.3 Mineral oil barrier papers 195
- 5.1.6 Water-Based Coatings and Adhesives 196
- 5.1.6.1 Replacing plastic laminations with aqueous coatings 196
- 5.1.6.2 Plant-based adhesives for box construction 197
- 5.1.7 Global market size and forecast to 2035 199
- 5.1.7.1 Tonnes 199
- 5.1.7.2 Revenues 200
- 5.2 FOOD PACKAGING 202
- 5.2.1 Films and trays 202
- 5.2.2 Pouches and bags 203
- 5.2.3 Textiles and nets 204
- 5.2.4 Compostable Food Containers 204
- 5.2.4.1 PLA (polylactic acid) trays and containers 204
- 5.2.4.2 Bagasse food service items 205
- 5.2.4.3 Molded fiber clamshells and trays 206
- 5.2.5 Biodegradable Films and Wraps 207
- 5.2.5.1 Cellulose-based films 207
- 5.2.5.2 PLA films for food wrapping 208
- 5.2.5.3 Starch-based wraps 209
- 5.2.6 Bio-Based Barrier Materials 210
- 5.2.6.1 Paper with biopolymer coatings 211
- 5.2.6.2 Plant-based waxes for moisture resistance 212
- 5.2.6.3 Microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) coatings 213
- 5.2.7 Reusable Food Packaging Systems 214
- 5.2.8 Bioadhesives 215
- 5.2.8.1 Starch 215
- 5.2.8.2 Cellulose 216
- 5.2.8.3 Protein-Based 216
- 5.2.9 Barrier coatings and films 216
- 5.2.9.1 Polysaccharides 217
- 5.2.9.1.1 Chitin 217
- 5.2.9.1.2 Chitosan 217
- 5.2.9.1.3 Starch 218
- 5.2.9.2 Poly(lactic acid) (PLA) 218
- 5.2.9.3 Poly(butylene Succinate) 218
- 5.2.9.4 Functional Lipid and Proteins Based Coatings 218
- 5.2.9.1 Polysaccharides 217
- 5.2.10 Active and Smart Food Packaging 218
- 5.2.10.1 Active Materials and Packaging Systems 218
- 5.2.10.2 Intelligent and Smart Food Packaging 219
- 5.2.10.3 Oxygen scavengers from natural materials 221
- 5.2.10.4 Antimicrobial packaging from plant extracts 221
- 5.2.10.5 Bio-based sensors for food freshness 222
- 5.2.11 Antimicrobial films and agents 224
- 5.2.11.1 Natural 224
- 5.2.11.2 Inorganic nanoparticles 225
- 5.2.11.3 Biopolymers 225
- 5.2.12 Bio-based Inks and Dyes 225
- 5.2.13 Edible films and coatings 226
- 5.2.13.1 Overview 226
- 5.2.13.2 Commercial examples 227
- 5.2.14 Types of sustainable coatings and films in packaging 229
- 5.2.14.1 Polyurethane coatings 229
- 5.2.14.1.1 Properties 229
- 5.2.14.1.2 Bio-based polyurethane coatings 230
- 5.2.14.1.3 Products 231
- 5.2.14.2 Acrylate resins 231
- 5.2.14.2.1 Properties 231
- 5.2.14.2.2 Bio-based acrylates 232
- 5.2.14.2.3 Products 232
- 5.2.14.3 Polylactic acid (Bio-PLA) 232
- 5.2.14.3.1 Properties 234
- 5.2.14.3.2 Bio-PLA coatings and films 234
- 5.2.14.4 Polyhydroxyalkanoates (PHA) coatings 235
- 5.2.14.5 Cellulose coatings and films 236
- 5.2.14.5.1 Microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) 236
- 5.2.14.5.2 Cellulose nanofibers 236
- 5.2.14.5.2.1 Properties 237
- 5.2.14.5.2.2 Product developers 238
- 5.2.14.6 Lignin coatings 240
- 5.2.14.7 Protein-based biomaterials for coatings 240
- 5.2.14.7.1 Plant derived proteins 240
- 5.2.14.7.2 Animal origin proteins 241
- 5.2.14.1 Polyurethane coatings 229
- 5.2.15 Global market size and forecast to 2035 242
- 5.2.15.1 Tonnes 242
- 5.2.15.2 Revenues 243
- 5.3 FLEXIBLE PACKAGING 245
- 5.3.1 Market overview 246
- 5.3.2 Compostable Flexible Films 246
- 5.3.2.1 PLA film laminates 246
- 5.3.2.2 PHAs (polyhydroxyalkanoates) films 247
- 5.3.2.3 PBAT (polybutylene adipate terephthalate) films 248
- 5.3.2.4 TPS (thermoplastic starch) films 249
- 5.3.3 Recyclable Mono-Materials 251
- 5.3.3.1 All-PE (polyethylene) structures 251
- 5.3.3.2 All-PP (polypropylene) structures 253
- 5.3.3.3 Designed for mechanical recycling 254
- 5.3.4 Paper-Based Flexible Packaging 255
- 5.3.4.1 High-strength paper with functional coatings 255
- 5.3.4.2 Paper-plastic hybrid structures with separable layers 256
- 5.3.4.3 Glassine and greaseproof papers 257
- 5.3.5 Bio-Based Films 258
- 5.3.5.1 Bio-PE films (from sugarcane) 258
- 5.3.5.2 Bio-PET films 259
- 5.3.5.3 Cellulose-based transparent films 260
- 5.3.6 Reduced Material Structures 261
- 5.3.6.1 Ultra-thin films with enhanced performance 262
- 5.3.6.2 Downgauged materials with reinforcing technologies 263
- 5.3.6.3 Resource-efficient multi-layer structures 264
- 5.3.7 Global market size and forecast to 2035 265
- 5.3.7.1 Tonnes 265
- 5.3.7.2 Revenues 266
- 5.4 RIGID PACKAGING 268
- 5.4.1 Market overview 268
- 5.4.2 Recycled Plastic Containers 268
- 5.4.2.1 rPET (recycled polyethylene terephthalate) bottles and containers 268
- 5.4.2.2 rHDPE (recycled high-density polyethylene) bottles 269
- 5.4.2.3 PCR polypropylene tubs and containers 270
- 5.4.3 Bio-Based Rigid Plastics 271
- 5.4.3.1 Bio-PET bottles (partially plant-based) 271
- 5.4.3.2 Bio-PE containers 272
- 5.4.3.3 PLA bottles and jars 273
- 5.4.4 Refillable/Reusable Systems 274
- 5.4.4.1 Durable containers designed for multiple uses 274
- 5.4.4.2 Standardized shapes for refill systems 274
- 5.4.4.3 Concentrated product formats reducing packaging 276
- 5.4.5 Alternative Materials 277
- 5.4.5.1 Mushroom packaging for protective applications 277
- 5.4.5.2 Molded pulp containers and inserts 278
- 5.4.5.3 Wood and cork containers for premium products 279
- 5.4.6 Glass and Metal Alternatives 280
- 5.4.6.1 Lightweight glass technologies 280
- 5.4.6.2 Thin-walled aluminum containers 282
- 5.4.6.3 Tin-free steel packaging 283
- 5.4.7 Global market and forecasts to 2025 284
- 5.4.7.1 Tonnes 284
- 5.4.7.2 Revenues 285
- 5.5 CARBON CAPTURE DERIVED MATERIALS FOR PACKAGING 287
- 5.5.1 Benefits of carbon utilization for plastics feedstocks 288
- 5.5.2 CO₂-derived polymers and plastics 290
- 5.5.3 CO2 utilization products 291
6 COMPANY PROFILES 292 (290 company profiles)
7 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 521
8 REFERENCES 522
List of Tables
- Table 1. Global sustainable packaging market by packaging materials, 2023-2035 (1,000 tonnes). 29
- Table 2. Global sustainable packaging market by packaging materials, 2023-2035 (Millions USD). 31
- Table 3. Global sustainable packaging market by packaging product type, 2023-2035 (1,000 tonnes). 32
- Table 4. Global sustainable packaging market by packaging product type, 2023-2035 (Millions USD). 33
- Table 5. Global sustainable packaging market by end-use market, 2023-2035 (1,000 tonnes). 34
- Table 6. Global sustainable packaging market by end-use market, 2023-2035 (Millions USD). 35
- Table 7. Global sustainable packaging market by region, 2023-2035 (1,000 tonnes). 36
- Table 8. Global sustainable packaging market by region, 2023-2035 (Millions USD). 37
- Table 9. Main Types of Sustainable Packaging Materials 38
- Table 10. Average prices by packaging type, 2024 (US$ per kg). 41
- Table 11. Average annual prices by bioplastic type, 2020-2023 (US$ per kg). 41
- Table 12. Recent sustainable packaging products. 42
- Table 13. Market trends in Sustainable Packaging 45
- Table 14. Market drivers for recent growth in the Sustainable Packaging market. 46
- Table 15. Challenges for Biodegradable and Compostable Packaging. 47
- Table 16. Types of bio-based plastics and fossil-fuel-based plastics 77
- Table 17. Comparison of synthetic fossil-based and bio-based polymers. 82
- Table 18. Processes for bioplastics in packaging. 83
- Table 19. LDPE film versus PLA, 2019–24 (USD/tonne). 84
- Table 20. PLA properties for packaging applications. 85
- Table 21. Applications, advantages and disadvantages of PHAs in packaging. 103
- Table 22. Major polymers found in the extracellular covering of different algae. 109
- Table 23. Market overview for cellulose microfibers (microfibrillated cellulose) in paperboard and packaging-market age, key benefits, applications and producers. 110
- Table 24. Applications of nanocrystalline cellulose (CNC). 112
- Table 25. Market overview for cellulose nanofibers in packaging. 114
- Table 26. Applications of Bacterial Nanocellulose in Packaging. 121
- Table 27. Types of protein based-bioplastics, applications and companies. 123
- Table 28. Overview of alginate-description, properties, application and market size. 126
- Table 29. Companies developing algal-based bioplastics. 127
- Table 30. Overview of mycelium fibers-description, properties, drawbacks and applications. 127
- Table 31. Overview of chitosan-description, properties, drawbacks and applications. 130
- Table 32. Commercial Examples of Chitosan-based Films and Coatings and Companies. 130
- Table 33. Bio-based naphtha markets and applications. 132
- Table 34. Bio-naphtha market value chain. 133
- Table 35. Commercial Examples of Bio-Naphtha Packaging and Companies. 134
- Table 36. Overview of the recycling technologies. 136
- Table 37. Polymer types, use, and recovery. 137
- Table 38. Composition of plastic waste streams. 138
- Table 39. Comparison of mechanical and advanced chemical recycling. 139
- Table 40. Advanced plastics recycling capacities, by technology. 139
- Table 41. Example chemically recycled plastic products. 144
- Table 42. Life Cycle Assessments (LCA) of Advanced Chemical Recycling Processes. 147
- Table 43. Summary of non-catalytic pyrolysis technologies. 149
- Table 44. Summary of catalytic pyrolysis technologies. 150
- Table 45. Summary of pyrolysis technique under different operating conditions. 153
- Table 46. Biomass materials and their bio-oil yield. 154
- Table 47. Biofuel production cost from the biomass pyrolysis process. 154
- Table 48. Pyrolysis companies and plant capacities, current and planned. 158
- Table 49. Summary of gasification technologies. 159
- Table 50. Advanced recycling (Gasification) companies. 165
- Table 51. Summary of dissolution technologies. 166
- Table 52. Advanced recycling (Dissolution) companies 168
- Table 53. Depolymerisation processes for PET, PU, PC and PA, products and yields. 170
- Table 54. Summary of hydrolysis technologies-feedstocks, process, outputs, commercial maturity and technology developers. 171
- Table 55. Summary of Enzymolysis technologies-feedstocks, process, outputs, commercial maturity and technology developers. 172
- Table 56. Summary of methanolysis technologies-feedstocks, process, outputs, commercial maturity and technology developers. 174
- Table 57. Summary of glycolysis technologies-feedstocks, process, outputs, commercial maturity and technology developers. 176
- Table 58. Summary of aminolysis technologies. 178
- Table 59. Advanced recycling (Depolymerisation) companies and capacities (current and planned). 179
- Table 60. Overview of hydrothermal cracking for advanced chemical recycling. 180
- Table 61. Overview of Pyrolysis with in-line reforming for advanced chemical recycling. 181
- Table 62. Overview of microwave-assisted pyrolysis for advanced chemical recycling. 181
- Table 63. Overview of plasma pyrolysis for advanced chemical recycling. 182
- Table 64. Overview of plasma gasification for advanced chemical recycling. 183
- Table 65. The global market for sustainable paper & board packaging by material type, 2019–2035 (‘000 tonnes). 199
- Table 66. The global market for sustainable paper & board packaging by material type, 2019–2035 (Millions USD). 200
- Table 67. Pros and cons of different type of food packaging materials. 202
- Table 68. Active Biodegradable Films films and their food applications. 219
- Table 69. Intelligent Biodegradable Films. 220
- Table 70. Edible films and coatings market summary. 226
- Table 71. Types of polyols. 229
- Table 72. Polyol producers. 230
- Table 73. Bio-based polyurethane coating products. 231
- Table 74. Bio-based acrylate resin products. 232
- Table 75. Polylactic acid (PLA) market analysis. 233
- Table 76. Commercially available PHAs. 235
- Table 77. Market overview for cellulose nanofibers in paints and coatings. 237
- Table 78. Companies developing cellulose nanofibers products in paints and coatings. 238
- Table 79. Types of protein based-biomaterials, applications and companies. 241
- Table 80. The global market for sustainable food packaging by material type, 2019–2035 (‘000 tonnes). 242
- Table 81. The global market for sustainable food packaging by material type, 2019–2035 (Millions USD). 243
- Table 82. Comparison of bioplastics’ (PLA and PHAs) properties to other common polymers used in product packaging. 250
- Table 83. Typical applications for bioplastics in flexible packaging. 250
- Table 84. The global market for sustainable flexible packaging by material type, 2019–2035 (‘000 tonnes). 265
- Table 85. The global market for sustainable flexible packaging by material type, 2019–2035 (Millions USD). 266
- Table 86. Typical applications for bioplastics in rigid packaging. 273
- Table 87. The global market for sustainable rigid packaging by material type, 2019–2035 (‘000 tonnes). 284
- Table 88. The global market for sustainable rigid packaging by material type, 2019–2035 (Millions USD). 285
- Table 89. CO2 utilization and removal pathways. 288
- Table 90. CO2 utilization products developed by chemical and plastic producers. 291
- Table 91. Lactips plastic pellets. 419
- Table 92. Oji Holdings CNF products. 452
List of Figures
- Figure 1. Global packaging market by material type. 27
- Figure 2. Unilever’s Magnum ice cream tub using 100% chemically recycled PP . 27
- Figure 3. Global sustainable packaging market by packaging materials, 2023-2035 (1,000 tonnes). 30
- Figure 4. Global sustainable packaging market by packaging materials, 2023-2035 (Millions USD). 31
- Figure 5. Global sustainable packaging market by packaging product type, 2023-2035 (1,000 tonnes). 32
- Figure 6. Global sustainable packaging market by packaging product type, 2023-2035 (Millions USD). 33
- Figure 7. Global sustainable packaging market by end-use market, 2023-2035 (1,000 tonnes). 34
- Figure 8. Global sustainable packaging market by end-use market, 2023-2035 (Millions USD). 35
- Figure 9. Global sustainable packaging market by region, 2023-2035 (1,000 tonnes). 36
- Figure 10. Global sustainable packaging market by region, 2023-2035 (Millions USD). 37
- Figure 11. Packaging lifecycle . 71
- Figure 12. Routes for synthesizing polymers from fossil-based and bio-based resources. 81
- Figure 13. Organization and morphology of cellulose synthesizing terminal complexes (TCs) in different organisms. 107
- Figure 14. Biosynthesis of (a) wood cellulose (b) tunicate cellulose and (c) BC. 108
- Figure 15. Cellulose microfibrils and nanofibrils. 110
- Figure 16. TEM image of cellulose nanocrystals. 111
- Figure 17. CNC slurry. 111
- Figure 18. CNF gel. 113
- Figure 19. Bacterial nanocellulose shapes 120
- Figure 20. BLOOM masterbatch from Algix. 126
- Figure 21. Typical structure of mycelium-based foam. 129
- Figure 22. Current management systems for waste plastics. 135
- Figure 23. Global polymer demand 2022-2040, segmented by technology, million metric tons. 142
- Figure 24. Global demand by recycling process, 2020-2040, million metric tons. 143
- Figure 25. Market map for advanced recycling. 145
- Figure 26. Value chain for advanced plastics recycling market. 146
- Figure 27. Schematic layout of a pyrolysis plant. 148
- Figure 28. Waste plastic production pathways to (A) diesel and (B) gasoline 152
- Figure 29. Schematic for Pyrolysis of Scrap Tires. 156
- Figure 30. Used tires conversion process. 157
- Figure 31. SWOT analysis-pyrolysis for advanced recycling. 157
- Figure 32. Total syngas market by product in MM Nm³/h of Syngas, 2021. 161
- Figure 33. Overview of biogas utilization. 162
- Figure 34. Biogas and biomethane pathways. 163
- Figure 35. SWOT analysis-gasification for advanced recycling. 165
- Figure 36. SWOT analysis-dissoluton for advanced recycling. 168
- Figure 37. Products obtained through the different solvolysis pathways of PET, PU, and PA. 169
- Figure 38. SWOT analysis-Hydrolysis for advanced chemical recycling. 172
- Figure 39. SWOT analysis-Enzymolysis for advanced chemical recycling. 173
- Figure 40. SWOT analysis-Methanolysis for advanced chemical recycling. 175
- Figure 41. SWOT analysis-Glycolysis for advanced chemical recycling. 177
- Figure 42. Mondelez confectionery packaging using chemically recycled PCR . 178
- Figure 43. SWOT analysis-Aminolysis for advanced chemical recycling. 179
- Figure 44. Kit Kat packaged in paper flow wrap . 190
- Figure 45. Quality Street paper-based chocolate packaging . 193
- Figure 46. Smarties paper-based chocolate packaging . 193
- Figure 47. The global market for sustainable paper & board packaging by material type, 2019–2035 (‘000 tonnes). 200
- Figure 48. The global market for sustainable paper & board packaging by material type, 2019–2035 (Millions USD). 202
- Figure 49. Chemically recycled PCR (up to 30%) for Hetbahn plastic tubs . 207
- Figure 50. Types of bio-based materials used for antimicrobial food packaging application. 224
- Figure 51. Water soluble packaging by Notpla. 228
- Figure 52. Examples of edible films in food packaging. 229
- Figure 53. Hefcel-coated wood (left) and untreated wood (right) after 30 seconds flame test. 240
- Figure 54. The global market for sustainable food packaging by material type, 2019–2035 (‘000 tonnes). 243
- Figure 55. The global market for sustainable food packaging by material type, 2019–2035 (Millions USD). 245
- Figure 56. Twinings mono-material standup pouches 251
- Figure 57. Rezorce mono-material PP carton lifecycle. 252
- Figure 58. Haleon mono-material blister packaging development. 252
- Figure 59. DRS system for Hetbahn bowls . 255
- Figure 60. The global market for sustainable flexible packaging by material type, 2019–2035 (‘000 tonnes). 266
- Figure 61. The global market for sustainable flexible packaging by material type, 2019–2035 (Millions USD). 268
- Figure 62. The global market for sustainable rigid packaging by material type, 2019–2035 (‘000 tonnes). 285
- Figure 63. The global market for sustainable rigid packaging by material type, 2019–2035 (Millions USD). 286
- Figure 64. Applications for CO2. 288
- Figure 65. Life cycle of CO2-derived products and services. 290
- Figure 66. Conversion pathways for CO2-derived polymeric materials 291
- Figure 67. Pluumo. 296
- Figure 68. Anpoly cellulose nanofiber hydrogel. 306
- Figure 69. MEDICELLU™. 307
- Figure 70. Asahi Kasei CNF fabric sheet. 313
- Figure 71. Properties of Asahi Kasei cellulose nanofiber nonwoven fabric. 314
- Figure 72. CNF nonwoven fabric. 315
- Figure 73. Passionfruit wrapped in Xgo Circular packaging. 320
- Figure 74. Be Green Packaging molded fiber products. 321
- Figure 75. Beyond Meat Molded Fiber Sausage Tray. 322
- Figure 76. BIOLO e-commerce mailer bag made from PHA. 327
- Figure 77. Reusable and recyclable foodservice cups, lids, and straws from Joinease Hong Kong Ltd., made with plant-based NuPlastiQ BioPolymer from BioLogiQ, Inc. 328
- Figure 78. Fiber-based screw cap. 336
- Figure 79. Molded fiber trays for contact lenses. 339
- Figure 80. SEELCAP ONEGO. 342
- Figure 81. CJ CheilJedang's biodegradable PHA-based wrapper for shipping products. 351
- Figure 82. CuanSave film. 355
- Figure 83. Cullen Eco-Friendly Packaging beerGUARD molded fiber trays. 356
- Figure 84. ELLEX products. 358
- Figure 85. CNF-reinforced PP compounds. 359
- Figure 86. Kirekira! toilet wipes. 359
- Figure 87. Edible packaging from Dissolves. 363
- Figure 88. Rheocrysta spray. 364
- Figure 89. DKS CNF products. 364
- Figure 90. Molded fiber plastic rings. 368
- Figure 91. Mushroom leather. 374
- Figure 92. Evoware edible seaweed-based packaging 380
- Figure 93. Photograph (a) and micrograph (b) of mineral/ MFC composite showing the high viscosity and fibrillar structure. 382
- Figure 94. Forest and Whale container. 390
- Figure 95. PHA production process. 392
- Figure 96. Soy Silvestre’s wheatgrass shots. 393
- Figure 97. Genera molded fiber meat trays. 396
- Figure 98. AVAPTM process. 399
- Figure 99. GreenPower+™ process. 400
- Figure 100. Cutlery samples (spoon, knife, fork) made of nano cellulose and biodegradable plastic composite materials. 402
- Figure 101. CNF gel. 404
- Figure 102. Block nanocellulose material. 405
- Figure 103. CNF products developed by Hokuetsu. 405
- Figure 104. Unilever Carte D’Or ice cream packaging. 408
- Figure 105. Kami Shoji CNF products. 413
- Figure 106. Matrix Pack molded-fiber beverage cup lid. 426
- Figure 107. Molded fiber Labeling applied to products. 427
- Figure 108. IPA synthesis method. 434
- Figure 109. Compostable water pod. 447
- Figure 110. Coca-cola paper bottle prototype. 457
- Figure 111. Papierfabrik Meldorf’s grass-based packaging materials . 458
- Figure 112. PulPac dry molded fiber packaging for cosmetics. 467
- Figure 113. XCNF. 470
- Figure 114: Innventia AB movable nanocellulose demo plant. 471
- Figure 115. Molded fiber tray. 473
- Figure 116. Shellworks packaging containers. 478
- Figure 117. Thales packaging incorporating Fibrease. 484
- Figure 118. Molded pulp bottles. 485
- Figure 119. Sulapac cosmetics containers. 486
- Figure 120. Sulzer equipment for PLA polymerization processing. 487
- Figure 121. Molded fiber laundry detergent bottle. 492
- Figure 122. Tanbark’s clamshell product. 493
- Figure 123. Silver / CNF composite dispersions. 500
- Figure 124. CNF/nanosilver powder. 500
- Figure 125. Corbion FDCA production process. 502
- Figure 126. UFP Technologies, Inc. product examples. 504
- Figure 127. UPM biorefinery process. 506
- Figure 128. Varden coffee pod. 509
- Figure 129. Vegea production process. 510
- Figure 130. Worn Again products. 513
- Figure 131. npulp packaging. 514
- Figure 132. Western Pulp Products corner protectors. 515
- Figure 133. S-CNF in powder form. 518
Payment methods: Visa, Mastercard, American Express, Paypal, Bank Transfer. To order by Bank Transfer (Invoice) select this option from the payment methods menu after adding to cart, or contact info@futuremarketsinc.com